Concerned Parent

Hyde Addison Administers did not inform parent that their child had been threatened to be unalived by another student until nearly three hours after the threat was received. Katie Mustian, Assistant Principal, refused to tell the parent of the child who had been threatened, the name of the student whom expressed intent to unalive their child and refused to inform the parent if other student was removed from school premises. When asked if the student who had been threatened was expected to return to school the next day , Ms. Mustian provided what was received as a “tone death” response of “the school will be open tomorrow”. The student who expressed intent to unalive other child remained in classes the next day and made physical contact with the “would be victim”. When informed that a second encounter had occurred, Ms. Mustian stated that she was not aware and “had been in a meeting” and requested the parent of the threatened child “make an appointment” to discuss their concerns. Ms. Mustian did not inform the concerned parent of any immediate action that was to be taken to stop the “self-confessed would be murderer” from accessing their “would be victim” as she stated that she needed to “return to meeting”. Concerned parent also attempted to plead with school Principal to immediately take action but was told that he was “unavailable and in a meeting”. When child who was threatened informed staff that they “felt unsafe” after second encounter, they were told by staff to “just stay away” from other student. The student who expressed intent to unalive other child remains in classes at Hyde-Addison without the full awareness of each parent whom also sends their children to school each morning.

Hyde Addison Administers did not inform parent that their child had been threatened to be unalived by another student until nearly three hours after the threat was received. Katie Mustian, Assistant Principal, refused to tell the parent of the child who had been threatened, the name of the student whom expressed intent to unalive their child and refused to inform the parent if other student was removed from school premises. When asked if the student who had been threatened was expected to return to school the next day , Ms. Mustian provided what was received as a “tone death” response of “the school will be open tomorrow”. The student who expressed intent to unalive other child remained in classes the next day and made physical contact with the “would be victim”. When informed that a second encounter had occurred, Ms. Mustian stated that she was not aware and “had been in a meeting” and requested the parent of the threatened child “make an appointment” to discuss their concerns. Ms. Mustian did not inform the concerned parent of any immediate action that was to be taken to stop the “self-confessed would be murderer” from accessing their “would be victim” as she stated that she needed to “return to meeting”. Concerned parent also attempted to plead with school Principal to immediately take action but was told that he was “unavailable and in a meeting”. When child who was threatened informed staff that they “felt unsafe” after second encounter, they were told by staff to “just stay away” from other student. The student who expressed intent to unalive other child remains in classes at Hyde-Addison without the full awareness of each parent whom also sends their children to school each morning.